Hawaii Supreme Court, 2025

Nice v. Lopez

Nice v. Lopez
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided February 14, 2025

Nice v. Lopez

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 14-FEB-2025 11:58 AM Dkt. 91 ODMR

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX, SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX, and SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX CAMERON NICE and MARTHA NICE, Petitioners, vs. THE HONORABLE ANNE E. LOPEZ, Attorney General, Department of the Attorney General, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent.

(5CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX CAMERON NICE and MARTHA NICE, Petitioners, vs. THE HONORABLE KATHERINE G. LEONARD, Acting Chief Judge of the Intermediate Court of Appeals; THE HONORABLE KAREN T. NAKASONE, Associate Judge of the Intermediate Court of Appeals; and THE HONORABLE SONJA M.P. MCCULLEN, Associate Judge of the Intermediate Court of Appeals, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judges.

(CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX) SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX CAMERON NICE and MARTHA NICE, Petitioners, vs. THE HONORABLE RANDAL VALENCIANO, Judge of the Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge.

(5CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Ginoza, and Eddins, JJ., and Circuit Judge Kawamura, in place of Devens, J., recused) Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration filed on February 6, 2025, which seeks reconsideration of this court’s February 4, 2025 order denying the petitions for writ of mandamus, and the record, this court has not overlooked or misapprehended points of law or fact. See Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(b) (eff. 2000).

It is ordered that the motion is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, February 14, 2025.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Shirley M. Kawamura

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.