Hawaii Supreme Court, 2025

Bloch v. Ng

Bloch v. Ng
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided February 19, 2025
Bloch v. Ng

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 19-FEB-2025 10:55 AM Dkt. 20 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________ DAVID MICHAEL BLOCH, an individual; and KULA DAVES INC., a for profit S Corporation, by and through David Bloch, Petitioners, vs. THE HONORABLE JEFFREY NG, Judge of the Family Court of the Third Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge, and JEREMY BUTTERFIELD, ESQ. and ANNETTE BLOCH, Respondents. ________________________________________________________________ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 3FDV-XX-XXXXXXX) ORDER DENYING PETITION AND MOTION FOR STAY (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus or prohibition filed on November 13, 2024, the motion for stay pending appeal filed on November 29, 2024, and the record, Petitioner has not demonstrated that an extraordinary writ is warranted because an extraordinary writ is not meant to be used in lieu of normal appellate procedures. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023).

Petitioner has also not demonstrated that a stay is warranted. See Stop Rail Now v. DeCosta, 120 Hawaiʻi 238, 243, 203 P.3d 658, 663 (App. 2008).

It is ordered that the petition and motion for stay pending appeal are denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, February 19, 2025.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Vladimir P. Devens

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.