Hawaii Supreme Court, 2025

Smith v. Tonaki

Smith v. Tonaki
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided April 30, 2025

Smith v. Tonaki

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 30-APR-2025 10:40 AM Dkt. 11 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________ DEXTER J. SMITH, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE JOHN M. TONAKI, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge, and CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, Respondent. ________________________________________________________________ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Souza, in place of Devens, J., recused) Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus filed December 4, 2024, and the record, Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief, nor a lack of alternative means to obtain the relief sought. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023); see also Rules of the Circuit Courts of the State of Hawaiʻi (RCCH) Rule 2(e)(1) (2019).

It is ordered that the petition is denied.

In denying the petition, we note that certified copies of the complaint may be obtained from the circuit court clerk pursuant to RCCH Rule 2.2. Under the circumstances of this case, it is further ordered that the appellate clerk shall provide Petitioner with two certified copies of the complaint without payment of the necessary costs and fees.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, April 30, 2025.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Kevin A. Souza

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.