Hawaii Supreme Court, 2026

Fung v. Hoi

Fung v. Hoi
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided May 20, 2026
Fung v. Hoi

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 20-MAY-2026 03:40 PM Dkt. 20 ODSMR

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

WEI LING FUNG, Petitioner/Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, vs. WA CHAM HOI, Respondent/Defendant/Counterclaimant/ Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and FUGANG XIA aka SUMMER, Petitioner/Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE. NO. 1DRC-XX-XXXXXXX) ORDER DISMISSING MOTION (By: Devens, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Castagnetti, assigned by reason of vacancy) Upon consideration of Petitioners’ “Motion for Clarification or, in the Alternative, Recall of Order Denying Certiorari,” which we construe as a motion for reconsideration of the order rejecting certiorari filed on April 20, 2026, Respondent’s opposition, and the record herein, It is ordered that the Motion is dismissed. See Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40.1(h) (“Neither acceptance nor rejection of an application for a writ of certiorari shall be subject to a motion for reconsideration in the supreme court. The rejection of an application for certiorari shall be final.”).

It is further ordered that Respondent’s request for attorney fees and costs is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 20, 2026.

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Jeannette H. Castagnetti

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.