Zeeman v. County of Hawai'i
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 22-MAY-2026 12:41 PM Dkt. 17 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
AARON ZEEMAN, Petitioner, vs. COUNTY OF HAWAIʻI; HAWAIʻI COUNTY COUNCIL; Respondents, and JEFF DARROW, in his official capacity as Planning Director; and ASHLEY KIERKIEWICZ, in her official capacity as Council Member, District 4, Respondents.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (3CCV-XX-XXXXXXX) ORDER (By: Devens, C.J., McKenna, Ginoza, JJ., Circuit Court Judge Toʻotoʻo, in place of Eddins, J. recused, and Circuit Court Judge Somerville, assigned by reason of vacancy) Upon consideration of Petitioner Aaron Zeeman’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus, filed May 1, 2026, and the record, Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief, and the lack of other means to redress adequately the alleged wrong. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaii 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023). Moreover, Petitioner failed to establish that the conduct underlying the Petition is ministerial. See In re Disciplinary Bd. of Hawaiʻi Supreme Court, 91 Hawaiʻi 363, 368, 984 P.2d 688, 693 (1999).
The Petition is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 22, 2026.
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Faʻauuga L. Toʻotoʻo /s/ Rowena A. Somerville
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.