State of Iowa v. Raymond Dean Perry
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 19-1705 Filed March 17, 2021
STATE OF IOWA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. RAYMOND DEAN PERRY,
Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Jason A. Burns, District Associate Judge.
Raymond Perry appeals the order imposing restitution for court-appointed attorney fees and court costs. SENTENCE AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
John J. Bishop, Cedar Rapids, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Israel Kodiaga, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Considered by Bower, C.J., and Doyle and Mullins, JJ.
DOYLE, Judge.
The State charged Raymond Perry with operating while intoxicated and possession of a controlled substance. He entered a written plea agreement in which he pled guilty to both counts. In September 2019, the district court entered judgment and sentence, which included that Perry pay a fine “plus all applicable surcharges, court costs, attorney fees, and victim restitution, if any.” The restitution portion of the judgment assessed Perry with court costs1 and $60 for court- appointed attorney fees. On appeal, Perry claims the district court erred by ordering restitution without making a reasonable-ability-to-pay determination as to all potential restitution.2
A district court may only order restitution for court-appointed attorney fees and court costs after finding the defendant has a reasonable ability to pay. State v. Albright, 925 N.W.2d 144, 159 (Iowa 2019).3 The order imposing judgment and sentence provides, “Public Defender fees are assessed at $60 unless a different amount has been certified. Based upon the record made, the court finds that defendant is reasonably able to pay up to $60 for reimbursement of court- appointed attorney fees.” Because the order clearly indicates the court made a reasonable-ability-to-pay determination as to attorney fees, we affirm the attorney fees portion of the restitution order. But the district court made no reasonable- ability-to-pay determination in regard to the court costs assessed in the restitution order. We therefore vacate the provision assessing Perry court costs and remand to the district court to make a reasonable-ability-to-pay determination consistent with Albright.4
SENTENCE AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.