Crittenden v. Steele
Crittenden v. Steele
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Suit brought against Steele on the following letter of credit:
Keosauqua, September 25, 1850.
Mr. II. Crittenden — Dear Sir: Mr. O. E. Jones wishes to purchase some paper on short time. If you will fill his order I will he responsible. William Steele.
Befer to Tevis Scott & Tevis, or W. B. Cox.
The plaintiff claims in his petition one hundred and fifty dollars, and states as the cause of said claim, that the defendant executed the above letter of credit directed to the petitioner and delivered the same to said Jones, who delivered the same to the plaintiff upon which he delivered to said Jones the paper as set forth in the petition, amounting' to ninety-six dollars and sixty-three cents, on sixty days time. To this petition the defendant filed a general demurrer, also an answer. Eor answer, he states that he is not indebted to the plaintiff in any sum. That he had no notice that said plaintiff credited said Jones at all, and that said Jones was solvent and able to pay said note when the same became due, but afterwards became insolvent, and that he has since become worthless and left the country.
It appears from the record that the cause was tried upon the demurrer to the plair. tiff’s petition and the demunor sustained. This was error. The petition showed prima facie a right of action. The undertaking of Steele was
Judgment reversed,
Reference
- Status
- Published