The receipts offered in evidence by defendant, if intended for no other purpose, may have been proper to lay the foundation for the defendant’s claim for damages, by reason of the alleged failure of plaintiff to finish the frame building in a workmanlike manner. As the bill of exceptions does not. pretend to set out the whole of the evidence in the cause, we cannot say that the receipts were not properly admitted by the court. ' And the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.