Supreme Court of Iowa, 1860

State v. Accola

State v. Accola
Supreme Court of Iowa · Decided December 5, 1860 · Wright
11 Iowa 246

State v. Accola

Opinion of the Court

Wright, J.

Defendant was convicted for violating section 2721 of the Code, and moved for a new trial, upon the ground that the jurors, as shown by the affidavit of two of them, had during their retirement read the notes of the testimony as taken by one of the attorneys on the trial.

Upon the authority of Abel v. Kennedy, 3 G. Greene 47; Shields v. Guffey 9 Iowa 322; Langworthy v. Myers, 4 Ib. 18; the motion was properly overruled. And see 1 Gra. & Wat. on New Trials 79, 80; 3 Ib. 1261.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.