Supreme Court of Iowa, 1864

Huntingdon v. Howe

Huntingdon v. Howe
Supreme Court of Iowa · Decided January 5, 1864 · Lowe
15 Iowa 606; 1864 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 277
Huntingdon v. Howe

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Tiie judgment of the Court was announced by —

Lowe, J.

Suit on an attachment bond, in which the plaintiff recovered a judgment of $1,400, and the defendants appeal, assigning for error the overruling of their motion for a new trial, the grounds of which were that the verdict was excessive, contrary to law, and the evidence in the case; and also, that the court had erred in refusing and giving certain instructions.

A careful review of the case, including the argument of counsel, has strongly impressed our minds with the conviction that the verdict of the jury was so manifestly above and beyond anything which the evidence would authorize, that we feel it our duty to reverse the cause, *607and award to the parties a venire de novo, which is accordingly done.

Casady & Polk for the appellant— Cole, Clinton and Street for the appellee.

Beversed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.