Daniel v. McDaniel
Daniel v. McDaniel
16 Iowa 589
Daniel v. McDaniel
Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the Court was pronounced by — .
Application for a writ of habeas corpus on the hearing of which the court sustained the demurrer to the defendant’s answer, who, failing to plead over, the court held the application well founded
Affirmed.
Casey for the appellant — Dorr for the appellee.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.