Hazlett v. Burge
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Depugh v. Frazier (Iowa 1914)
- Bolds v. Woods (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
- Markel v. Moudy (Neb. 1881)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Defendant had no power to allow the claim without the approbation of the County Court. Kev., § 2393.
It is not averred, at least with distinctness, that the defendant agreed with the plaintiff to act for him and to procure the allowance of the claim by the county judge.
Admitting that there may be cases in which fraud may be predicated of a failure to do some future act, we are unanimously of the opinion, that the facts stated in the petition do not make such a case against the defendant as to justify a recovery against him on the ground of fraud.
The cause will be remanded, with the same order as to amendment, that was made in the preceding case.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.