Roberts v. Cass
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Estate of Willis (Iowa 1988)
- Doyle v. Duckworth (Iowa 1910)
- Young v. Scoville (Iowa 1896)
- In re Estate of Malvin (Iowa 1894)
- Terpening v. Holton (Colo. 1886)
- Dicken v. Morgan (Iowa 1882)
- Bauder v. Hinckley (Iowa 1882)
- Michael v. Longman (Iowa 1876)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
No exceptions appear to have been taken to the report of the referee or the judgment rendered thereon. Eev. § 3095. We cannot therefore review the cause. See Phipps v. Penn, 23 Iowa, 30; Norton v. Swearengen, 19 id. 566; and cases in almost every volume of the reports. But it is insisted that, as the judgment was rendered in vacation, defendant had no opportunity to take exceptions, and therefore the rule should not apply in this case. We do not think this position correct. Upon the filing of the report of the referee defendant could have excepted thereto as well in vacation as in term, and, if an objection was necessary to the judgment, it could have been made at the time or after it was rendered. If these exceptions and objection had been made and brought to the attention of the court below, it is to be presumed that, if they had been well taken, the error’s complained of would have been then corrected.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.