Ringgold Co. v. Ross

Supreme Court of Iowa
Ringgold Co. v. Ross, 40 Iowa 176 (Iowa 1874)
Day

Ringgold Co. v. Ross

Opinion of the Court

Day, J.

The first error assigned needs not, in the state of the record, be considered. The bond was forfeited on the first day of the term, before an indictment had been found, and because of the failure of defendant to appear and challenge the grand jury. The forfeiture'was premature. The defendant had the privilege of appearing and objecting to the grand j ury, but he was under no obligation to do so.

The bond could be forfeited only for a failure to appear when his presence was lawfully required. The State of Iowa v. Klingman, 14 Iowa, 404.

Reversed.

Reference

Status
Published