Stark v. Sioux City & Pacific R.
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Browneller v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America (Iowa 1943)
- Brinkley v. Railroad Co. (N.C. 1904)
- Connolly v. Des Moines & Central Iowa Railway Co. (Iowa 1955)
- Long Island Railroad v. Sherwood (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1911)
- Postal Tel. Cable Co. of Utah v. Oregon S. L. R. (Utah 1901)
- Bennett v. City of Marion (Iowa 1898)
- Crandall v. Des Moines, Northern & Western Railroad (Iowa 1897)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The statute provides that “ any railroad corporation * * may take * * so much real estate as
We know of no law which -limits the company to fifty feet on each side of the center of its track. While the company, except for special purposes, cannot condemn more than one hundred feet, it may locate its track wherever it pleases on the land condemned. If, then, the defendant ought to be restricted as the injunction provides, it must be either because more land is not necessary, or because the company owns the lots on the east side of the track. Where a railroad company applies for a hundred feet or any less amount for á right of way, we think it must be conclusively presumed that the amount applied for is necessary.
The company is certainly the best judge as to how much land it needs, and should not be subjected to the embarrassment of proving it in court.
There remains, then, only to be considered, what is the effect of the company’s owning land adjacent to that which it desires to condemn. May it condemn the same width that it might otherwise condemn, and if not, what amount, if any? Suppose the land owned by the company is not suitable for its track; must it first sell its land in order that it may condemn what it needs? We think not. It cannot condemn, it is true, except for “ the location, construction, and convenient use of its railway.”
The railway, then,-must be located on the land condemned. With this restriction the land may extend in either direction within the limitation fixed by statute, that the land taken shall not exceed one hundred feet. If the company owns land on one side, the land condemned may extend in the other direction one hundred feet therefrom.
Reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.