Finch v. Hollinger
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Pierce (Iowa 1908)
- Doolittle v. Hall (Iowa 1889)
- Foule v. Mann (Iowa 1881)
- Warder, Mitchell & Co. v. Hoover & Co. (Iowa 1879)
- Peterson v. Espeset (Iowa 1878)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In the case of Kaster & Farwell v. Pease, 42 Iowa, 488, it was held that an action to recover possession of specific personal property cannot be maintained against a sheriff who holds the property by virtue of an execution, unless the plaintiff has prior to the commencement of the suit, given the sheriff notice of his ownership, in accordance with the provisions of the Code, Sec. 3055.
The judgment of the Circuit Court must be
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.