Hartman v. Anderson
Hartman v. Anderson
Opinion of the Court
It does not appear what showing of a right to redeem was made by Kuck to the auditor. It must, therefore, be presumed that it was sufficient. The treasurer has no power or authority to question the act of the auditor, and make a deed regardless of the redemption, and Julius A. Kuck’s right to redeem cannot be determined in an action against the treasurer.
An adjudication against the treasurer would leave the rights of the redemptioner the same as if no adjudication had been had.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.