The note is not void on its face. It is apparently valid, and so far as the record shows is still outstanding, and in the hands of the plaintiff. Possibly recovery may yet be had upon it. We think that the defendant was entitled to hold the horse; at least until he was discharged by an adjudication upon the note, or until the note was surrendered. *339Whether after that an action of replevin could be maintained for the horse we need not determine.

REVERSED.