Township of West Bend v. Munch
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hodges v. Kimball (4th Cir. 1899)
- Nebraska v. Hayden (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska 1898)
- Hume v. Kelly (Or. 1896)
- In re Appeal of Trustees of Iowa College (Iowa 1919)
- Theulen v. Township of Viola (Iowa 1908)
- Hanson v. City of Cresco (Iowa 1906)
- Sells v. Dermody (Iowa 1901)
- New York & New Jersey Telephone Co. v. Inhabitants of East Orange (New Jersey Court of Chancery 1887)
- Wells v. Grubb (Iowa 1882)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
tion cannot be maintained, and the demurrer should have been sustained upon the ground that the plaintiffs have not legal capacity to sue.
A township, under our system of government, is not a corporation authorized to sue and be sued. It is no more than a legal subdivision of the county for governmental purposes Its officers are paid for tlieir services by the county, except in special cases where payment is required to be made by private persons. Code, sections 3808-9-10. Any person elected to a township office, and refusing to qualify, shall forfeit five dollars, which may be recovered by action in the naihe of the county for the use of the school fund of the county. Section 394. These, and other provisions of the Code, indicate clearly that civil townships have no corporate powers, as such. It is true certain duties are imposed upon township officers. They may,
The judgment of the court below in sustainingtbe demurrer will 'be affirmed, upon the ground, however, that tbe plaintiffs-have not legal capacity to sue.
Affirmed-.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.