Auld v. Chamberlain

Supreme Court of Iowa
Auld v. Chamberlain, 52 Iowa 745 (Iowa 1879)
3 N.W. 635
Seevers

Auld v. Chamberlain

Opinion of the Court

Seevers, J.

— The errors assigned are that there is not sufficient evidence to warrant the judgment, and that the damages are excessive. Each of us *746have separately read and considered the evidence, and separately reached the conclusion rvc cannot interfere, under the settled practice of this court, with the judgment below. It is impossible to say the court was actuated by either passion or prejudice. On the contrary we are of the opinion the evidence fully warrants the finding.

Affirmed.

Reference

Status
Published