Katherine Avenarius and Paul Avenarius v. State of Iowa
Katherine Avenarius and Paul Avenarius v. State of Iowa
Opinion
In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 22–1419 Polk County No. LACL145293 ORDER Katherine Avenarius and Paul Avenarius, Appellees, vs. State of Iowa, Appellant.
The court, May, J., taking no part, being evenly divided, declares this case affirmed by operation of law. See Iowa Code § 602.4107 (2024).
The district court denied the State’s partial motion for summary judgment.
We granted the State’s application for interlocutory review and transferred the case to the court of appeals. The court of appeals affirmed. Christensen, C.J., and Oxley and McDermott, JJ., would affirm the court of appeals decision and district court judgment; Waterman, Mansfield, and McDonald, JJ., would vacate the court of appeals decision and reverse the district court judgment. See State v. Effler, 769 N.W.2d 880, 884 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]hen the supreme court is equally divided . . . , the decision of the district court is affirmed by operation of law.”).
Copies to: Nicholas Kilburg Job Mukkaka Assistant Attorney General Hoover State Office Building 1305 E. Walnut Street Des Moines, IA 50319
Todd Klapatauskas East 9th Street P.O. Box 239 Dubuque, IA 52004
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.