IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 42271 STATE OF IDAHO, ) 2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 564 ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Filed: July 27, 2015 ) v. ) Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk ) JEFFREY JOSEPH STUBBS, ) THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED ) OPINION AND SHALL NOT Defendant-Appellant. ) BE CITED AS AUTHORITY ) Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, Kootenai County. Hon. Richard S. Christensen, District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and concurrent unified sentences of nine years with four years determinate for two counts of aggravated battery, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth A. Allred, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. ________________________________________________ Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and GRATTON, Judge ________________________________________________ PER CURIAM Jeffrey Joseph Stubbs was found guilty of two counts of aggravated battery. Idaho Code § 18-903, 18-907(a). The district court sentenced Stubbs to concurrent unified sentences of nine years with four years determinate, and retained jurisdiction. Following the period of retained jurisdiction, the district court placed Stubbs on probation for a period of three years. Stubbs appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing excessive sentences.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014- (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Stubbs’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.