Idaho Court of Appeals, 2017

State v. Craig Bogan

State v. Craig Bogan
Idaho Court of Appeals · Decided November 30, 2017
State v. Craig Bogan

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44771

STATE OF IDAHO, ) 2017 Unpublished Opinion No. 657

)

Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Filed: November 30, 2017

)

v. ) Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

)

CRAIG BOGAN, ) THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

) OPINION AND SHALL NOT Defendant-Appellant. ) BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

)

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Bannock County. Hon. Robert C. Naftz, District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of eight years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years, for aggravated battery, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and HUSKEY, Judge ________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Craig Bogan pleaded guilty to aggravated battery, Idaho Code §§ 18-903, 18-907(1)(a). The district court imposed a unified eight-year sentence, with three years determinate. Bogan appeals, contending that his sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Bogan’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.