McNamee v. Steele
McNamee v. Steele
Opinion of the Court
— It appears from the petition and exhibits thereto attached and from the return of the defendant to the writ that the defendant, as the judge of the district court of the second judicial district, did, on the fifteenth day of May, 1902, without application therefor, and without notice to plaintiff, who had no opportunity whatever of presenting his defense, made an order suspending the plaintiff from practicing law as an attorney in all the courts of this state for a period of one year. Said order is void, because the judge had no juris
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.