Idaho Supreme Court, 1903

Baker v. Drews

Idaho Supreme Court · Decided December 15, 1903

9 Idaho 276; 74 P. 1130; 1903 Ida. LEXIS 47

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Sonleitner v. McLaren (Idaho 1933)
Kline v. Shoup (Idaho 1922)
Chapman v. Boehm (Idaho 1915)
Johnston v. Bronson (Idaho 1911)
Diamond Bank v. Van Meter (Idaho 1910)
Doust v. Rocky Mountain Bell Telephone Co. (Idaho 1908)
Mills v. Smiley (Idaho 1903)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per CURIAM.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal on Ithe ground that the notice of appeal was not served on the respondent Carl Drews. It appears from the record that Drews was served with summons and failed to appear and answer. Judgment was entered in favor of said respondent and defendants. An appeal was taken by the plaintiff and notice of appeal was not served on Drews. As it is clearly apparent from the record that Drews would be affected by a modification or reversal of the judgment, on the authority of Titiman et al., v. Alamance Min. Co., ante, p. 240, 74 Pac. 529, *277the motion must be sustained and the appeal dismissed, and fit is so ordered, with costs of appeal in favor of defendants Gowanlocks.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.