Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Idaho Supreme Court, 1921

Little v. Burlingham

Little v. Burlingham
Idaho Supreme Court · Decided May 17, 1921 · Budge, Dunn, Hearing, Lee, McCarthy, Rice, Took
33 Idaho 760; 198 P. 465; 1921 Ida. LEXIS 56

Counsel

Frawley & Koelseh, Martin & Cameron, Finley Monroe and J. P. Reed, for Appellant., Geo. C. Heubener, for Respondent Burlingham., Martin & Martin and "Wyman & Wyman, for Respondent Little.

Little v. Burlingham

Opinion of the Court

BUDGE, J.

The questions presented upon this appeal are identical with those in the ease of Little v. Burlingham, ante, p. 757, 198 Pac. 464. Upon the authority of that ease, the judgment in this case' is affirmed. Costs are awarded to respondents.

Rice, C. J., and Dunn and Lee, JJ., concur. McCarthy, J., did not sit at the hearing and took no part in this opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.