Idaho Supreme Court, 1922

State v. Kootlas

State v. Kootlas
Idaho Supreme Court · Decided May 29, 1922 · Budge, Dunn, Lee, McCarthy, Rice
35 Idaho 483; 207 P. 1116; 1922 Ida. LEXIS 91

State v. Kootlas

Opinion of the Court

MCCARTHY, J.

The case having been set for hearing, appellant submitted no brief or statement of points and authorities and was not represented. The Attorney General, representing respondent, appeared and moved that the judgment be affirmed. The motion is sustained. (Rule 48Ellsworth v. Hill, 34 Ida. 359, 200 Pac. 1067.)

Accordingly the judgment is affirmed.

Rice, C. J., and Budge, Dunn and Lee, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.