In Re Benedict
In Re Benedict
Opinion of the Court
T.R. Benedict made application to the Public Utilities Commission under sec.
Respondent Benedict moves to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that it was not perfected in accordance with the provisions of sec. 59-620, I. C. A., and rule 30 of this court, in that the transcript on appeal was not transmitted to the clerk of this court or filed by him within the time designated by rule 30 of this court, to wit, "within 90 days after the service of notice of appeal with the Commission." *Page 210
The respondent having failed to accompany his motion to dismiss the appeal with a certificate, making the showing required by rule 27, of this court, the said motion will not be considered and is, therefore, denied.
The law applicable to In re Garrett Transfer Storage Co.,ante, p. 200,
Costs to respondent.
Budge, C.J., and Givens, Morgan and Wernette, JJ., concur.
Addendum
Appellant has filed a petition for rehearing upon substantially the same grounds stated in the petition for rehearing in In re Garrett Transfer Storage Co., ante, p. 200,
Upon the authority of the opinion on the petition for rehearing in that matter, the petition for rehearing herein is denied.
Budge, C.J., and Givens, Morgan and Wernette, JJ., concur. *Page 211
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In the Matter of the Application of T. R. Benedict for Permission to Operate Motor Propelled Freight Service Between Idaho Falls, Idaho, and Salmon, Idaho, Under the Provisions of Chapter 267, Session Laws, Idaho, 1929. Gilmore and Pittsburg Railroad Company and Pioneer Garage Stages, Protestants and v. T. R. Benedict, Applicant And
- Status
- Published