State v. Congdon

Idaho Supreme Court
State v. Congdon, 96 Idaho 377 (Idaho 1974)
529 P.2d 773; 1974 Ida. LEXIS 460

State v. Congdon

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, who was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance based upon his plea of guilty, appeals solely on the claim that he was under the influence of paint thinner fumes at the time he entered his plea of guilty, and thus that- plea was not voluntarily entered. The record does not support this allegation. Such matters, outside of the record, cannot be considered on appeal, but must be raised, if at all, by an application for post conviction relief. I.C. § 19-4901 et seq.

Judgment of conviction affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Duane A. CONGDON
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published