Hutchinson v. J. R. Simplot Co.
Cases that cite this one
21 later published cases cite this decision.
- Lang v. Ustick Dental Office, P.A. (Idaho 1991)
- Spruell v. Allied Meadows Corp. (Idaho 1990)
- Booth v. City of Burley (Idaho 1978)
- Bybee v. State, Indus. Special Indem. (Idaho 1996)
- Steffen v. Davison, Copple, Copple & Copple (Idaho 1991)
- Jensen v. Siemsen (Idaho 1990)
- Brown v. Iowa Beef Processors (Idaho 1984)
- Matthews v. Bucyrus-Erie Co. (Idaho 1980)
- Jenkins v. Agri-Lines Corp. (Idaho 1979)
- Mason v. Donnelly Club (Idaho 2001)
- Alexander v. Harcon, Inc. (Idaho 2000)
- Sund v. Gambrel (Idaho 1995)
- Hamilton v. Ted Beamis Logging & Construction (Idaho 1995)
- Hart v. Deary High School (Idaho 1994)
- Campbell v. Bonneville County Board of Commissioners (Idaho 1994)
- J.R. Simplot Co. v. State (Idaho 1986)
- Meyer v. Skyline Mobile Homes (Idaho 1979)
- Gaehring v. Department of Employment (Idaho 1979)
- Meyer v. Skyline Mobile Homes (Idaho 1979)
- Simmons v. Department of Employment (Idaho 1978)
- Moore v. Maine Department of Manpower Affairs, Employment Security Commission (Me. 1978)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order of the Industrial Commission upholding the Department of Employment’s denial of unemployment compensation benefits to the claimant appellant K. Jolene Hutchinson. Hutchinson had applied for benefits after being discharged by her employer J. R. Simplot Co. The Department of Employment had denied her benefits on the ground that she had been discharged for misconduct for violating company rules connected with her employment. See I.C. § 72-1366(e).
While violation of an employer’s rules is not, per se, misconduct which will render an employee ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits, Wroble v. Bonners Ferry Ranger Station, 97 Idaho 900, 556 P.2d 859 (1976); Avery v. B & B Rental Toilets, 97 Idaho 611, 549 P.2d 270 (1976), *347 deliberate violation of reasonable company rules ordinarily is misconduct which renders the claimant ineligible, cf. Wroble v. Bonners Ferry Ranger Station, supra; Avery v. B & B Rental Toilets, supra.
In this case the Industrial Commission found that the claimant Hutchinson had violated company rules because she had used company typewriters to write private letters during business hours and had repeatedly made private use of company telephones during working hours and had continued to do so after being warned about her violations. These findings are supported by substantial, though conflicting, evidence and will not be disturbed on appeal. I.C. §§ 72 — 1368(i), 72-732; Art. 5, § 9, Idaho Constitution; McIlwain v. Department of Employment, 98 Idaho 187, 560 P.2d 510 (1977).
The commission’s decision upheld the application of the rules, which in this case are not unreasonable, and that decision is supported by the record. The Industrial Commission did not err in affirming the denial of unemployment compensation benefits, and its decision is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.