Harding v. Kuessner
Harding v. Kuessner
80 Ill. App. 353; 1898 Ill. App. LEXIS 431
Harding v. Kuessner
Opinion
This was an appeal from an interlocutory order. The only question involved is the sufficiency of a creditor’s bill. Affirmed on authority of Bowen v. Parkhurst, 24 Ill. 257; First Natl. Bank v. Gage, 79 Ill. 207; Dormueil v. Ward, 108 Ill. 216; Edwards v. Rogers, 41 Ill. App. 405.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.