Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Illinois /Cases /Appellate Court of Illinois /

1904

668 Appellate Court of Illinois opinions from 1904.

  • Nangle v. Mullanny 113 Ill. App. 457, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Hecht v. Franklin 113 Ill. App. 467, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Kanorowski v. People 113 Ill. App. 468, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Marks v. Metzger Linseed Oil Co. 113 Ill. App. 475, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Smith v. Central Lumber Co. 113 Ill. App. 477, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Feitl v. Chicago City Railway Co. 113 Ill. App. 381, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Ruprecht v. Henrici 113 Ill. App. 398, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Gunning System v. LaPointe 113 Ill. App. 405, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • May v. Gesellschaft 113 Ill. App. 415, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • M. Dupuis Co. v. Cobb 113 Ill. App. 421, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Dyers & Cleaners' Union No. 10,168 v. Schuettauff 113 Ill. App. 422, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Chandler Mortgage Co. v. Loring 113 Ill. App. 423, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Delaware & Hudson Canal Co v. Mitchell 113 Ill. App. 429, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • United States Brewing Co. v. Stoltenherg 113 Ill. App. 435, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Brennan v. People 113 Ill. App. 361, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Peabody v. Munson 113 Ill. App. 296, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Hayes v. Wagner 113 Ill. App. 299, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Chicago Union Traction Co. v. Olsen 113 Ill. App. 303, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Central Union Building Co. v. Kolander 113 Ill. App. 305, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Parker v. Crilly 113 Ill. App. 309, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Papaliou v. Manusos 113 Ill. App. 316, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Hontros v. City of Chicago 113 Ill. App. 318, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Olson 113 Ill. App. 320, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Boor v. Tolman 113 Ill. App. 322, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Dearlove v. Hayward 113 Ill. App. 326, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Ward 113 Ill. App. 327, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Gunning v. Sorg 113 Ill. App. 332, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Kittler v. Studabaker 113 Ill. App. 342, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Kittler v. Studabaker 113 Ill. App. 352, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Woodard v. Glos 113 Ill. App. 353, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Adams v. Pease 113 Ill. App. 356, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Chicago Electric Transit Co. v. Kinnare 115 Ill. App. 115, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Chicago City Railway Co. v. Matthieson 113 Ill. App. 246, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Chicago Union Traction Co. v. O'Donnell 113 Ill. App. 259, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad v. Newell 113 Ill. App. 263, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Chicago Union Traction Co. v. Lawrence 113 Ill. App. 269, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • West Chicago Street Railway Co. v. Randolph 113 Ill. App. 274, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Chicago Consolidated Traction Co. v. Gervens 113 Ill. App. 275, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Chicago City Railway Co. v. Fetzer 113 Ill. App. 280, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Chicago City Railway Co. v. Enroth 113 Ill. App. 285, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • City of Mattoon v. Noyes 113 Ill. App. 111, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Drainage Commissioners of Drainage District No. 2 v. Drainage Commissioners of Union Drainage District No. 3 113 Ill. App. 114, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Robison v. Bailey 113 Ill. App. 123, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Wineteer v. Jones 113 Ill. App. 129, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • H. E. Mueller & Co. v. Kinkead 113 Ill. App. 132, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Langmuir v. Landes 113 Ill. App. 134, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Cochran v. County of Vermilion 113 Ill. App. 140, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Hand 113 Ill. App. 144, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Chicago, Peoria & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Mikesell 113 Ill. App. 146, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
  • Veach v. City of Champaign 113 Ill. App. 151, (Ill. App. Ct. 1904)
« Prev 1 … 8 9 10 11 12 … 14 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑