Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Illinois /Cases /Appellate Court of Illinois /

1913

1015 Appellate Court of Illinois opinions from 1913.

  • Franklin v. Continental Casualty Co. 184 Ill. App. 259, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Wing v. Little 184 Ill. App. 261, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • F. W. Cook Brewing Co. v. Goldblatt 184 Ill. App. 266, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Miller v. Assureds' National Mutual Fire Insurance 184 Ill. App. 271, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Hemmick v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad 184 Ill. App. 275, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • City of Jacksonville v. Vieira 184 Ill. App. 279, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Kaminiski v. Corn Products Refining Co. 184 Ill. App. 286, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Jones v. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. 184 Ill. App. 287, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Neal v. Burch 184 Ill. App. 288, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Moss v. Estate of Redmon 184 Ill. App. 290, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Adder Machine Co. v. Ross 184 Ill. App. 293, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Andrews v. City of White Hall 184 Ill. App. 298, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • O'Farrell v. Vickerage 184 Ill. App. 303, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Bristow v. St. Louis, Springfield & Peoria Railroad 184 Ill. App. 305, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Sleepy Eye Milling Co. v. Hartman 184 Ill. App. 308, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Byerly v. Jones 184 Ill. App. 314, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • McEvoy v. Court of Honor 184 Ill. App. 317, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Horn v. Sayer 184 Ill. App. 326, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Green v. Jennings 184 Ill. App. 340, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Switzer v. Honn 184 Ill. App. 348, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Nelson v. First National Bank 184 Ill. App. 349, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Hapenny v. Huffman 184 Ill. App. 351, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Rasar & Johnson v. Spurling 184 Ill. App. 357, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Miller v. Eversole 184 Ill. App. 362, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Minks v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad 184 Ill. App. 369, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Nash v. Eddy 184 Ill. App. 375, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Bacon v. Walsh 184 Ill. App. 377, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • American Insurance Co. of Newark v. McClelland 184 Ill. App. 381, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Tolly v. Millikin National Bank 184 Ill. App. 386, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Boyle v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad 184 Ill. App. 387, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Rendtorff v. Lowman 184 Ill. App. 391, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Lisenbury v. St. Louis & Springfield Railway Co. 184 Ill. App. 395, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • City of Springfield v. Central Union Telephone Co. 184 Ill. App. 400, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Hoxsey v. St. Louis & Springfield Railway Co. 184 Ill. App. 410, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Stewart v. Illinois Central Railroad 184 Ill. App. 412, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Gnatek v. Chicago Railways Co. 182 Ill. App. 392, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Fisher v. Charles Levy Circulating Co. 182 Ill. App. 393, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Julian v. Pierson 182 Ill. App. 400, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • De Shelter v. American Spring Water Supply Co. 182 Ill. App. 403, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Strum v. Blair 182 Ill. App. 413, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Stern v. Welensky 182 Ill. App. 417, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Chase Brothers Piano Co. v. Conners 182 Ill. App. 418, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Hartford Suspension Co. v. Shadburne 182 Ill. App. 426, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • McDonald v. Modine 182 Ill. App. 429, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Huey v. Frank 182 Ill. App. 431, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Wisconsin Lime & Cement Co. v. Lelivet 182 Ill. App. 436, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Cohen v. Davis 182 Ill. App. 456, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Murray v. Gordon 182 Ill. App. 460, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • Ankele v. Workingmen's Relief Societies, A. U. V. O. 182 Ill. App. 470, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
  • White v. Estate of Herhold 182 Ill. App. 477, (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 21 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑