Appellate Court of Illinois, 1914

Buresh v. Seymour

Buresh v. Seymour
Appellate Court of Illinois · Decided June 15, 1914 · Baker
187 Ill. App. 295

Buresh v. Seymour

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Fraud, § 113*—proof by circumstantial evidence. Fraud may be proved by circumstantial evidence as well as direct evidence; but there must be shown by a preponderance of the evidence inculpatory facts from which a legitimate inference of fraudulent intent may be drawn. 3. Fraud, § 26*—when misrepresentations concerning a business not actionable. Misrepresentations as to value, probable future business or earnings are not actionable.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.