Appellate Court of Illinois, 1916

Rose v. Chicago City Railway Co.

Rose v. Chicago City Railway Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois · Decided June 19, 1916 · Pam
199 Ill. App. 600

Rose v. Chicago City Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Pam

delivered tffe opinion of the court.

3. Witnesses, § 311*—when testimony of interested witness will not he accepted. The testimony of an interested witness as to facts inherently unprobable need not be accepted by a court or jury, although such testimony is not contradicted by other direct testimony in the case, and although the witness is not otherwise impeached. 4. Trial, § 125*—right of counsel to state to fury their views as to the law. .Counsel may properly state to the jury what they believe to be the law and base arguments thereupon.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.