In re Meinhardt

Appellate Court of Illinois December 19, 1916

In re Meinhardt, 202 Ill. App. 266 (1916)

1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 911

Barnes

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Execution, § 295*—what is not conclusive as to whether malice was gist of action. The mere fact that the statement of claim, filed in an action in which a capias ad satisfaciendum issued, does not disclose that malice was of the gist of the action does not entitle an insolvent debtor to release from imprisonment under such an execution, since the evidence offered on the trial may have been sufficient to support the judgment on which the capias was issued.

Reference

Full Case Name: In the matter of the Petition of Maximilian Meinhardt, arrested at the suit of G. Bernhard Anderson, Conservator of the Estate of Brita Matson, Insane
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published