Pirek v. Scott

Appellate Court of Illinois
Pirek v. Scott, 206 Ill. App. 44 (1917)
Goodwin

Pirek v. Scott

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Witnesses, § 279*—what is admissible to contradict witness. A letter written by a witness which tended to contradict him, held properly admitted. 3. Appeal and error, § 1514*—when improper remarles of counsel are harmless error. In an action to recover money loaned, the act of plaintiff’s counsel in referring to plaintiff as a “poor workingman” is not ground for reversal where, on objection, the word “poor” was withdrawn and it was admitted that plaintiff was not poor. 4. Appeal and error, § 1514*—when error in conduct of counsel is harmless. Where a reference by plaintiff’s counsel to defendant’s witness as a “liar” is objected to and on defendant’s motion is stricken from the record, there is no reversible error.

Reference

Full Case Name
Albert Pirek v. Frank E. Scott
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published