Appellate Court of Illinois, 1917

Broad v. Broad

Appellate Court of Illinois · Decided July 19, 1917 · McDonald

207 Ill. App. 253; 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 624

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice McDonald

delivered the opinion of the court.

6. Receivers, § 2* — when appointment of receiver to protect interest in property is unnecessary. The appointment of a receiver in a suit for a divorce to protect the husband’s interest in property in the wife’s name, and which she owns jointly with a third person, is unnecessary where, upon proper showing, the wife could have been enjoined from disposing or incumbering her interest therein during the pendency of the suit.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.