Cermak v. Cable Piano Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois
Cermak v. Cable Piano Co., 211 Ill. App. 219 (1918)
Dever

Cermak v. Cable Piano Co.

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Dever

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Replevin, § 206* — what is effect of affidavit as evidence. The statements in an affidavit filed in a replevin suit as to the value of the property are to be regarded as at least prima facie proof of the value of the property. 5. Replevin, § 192* — when judgment not excessive in action on bond. In an action on a replevin bond, evidence held sufficient to warrant a judgment for plaintiff of $500, attorney’s fees, interest and costs. 6. Replevin, § 206* — what is effect of affidavit as to value of property. A witness signing an affidavit filed in a replevin suit as to the value of the property may not by testimony qualify or modify his statements made therein. 7. Replevin, § 190* — when interest allowed in action on hond. In an action on a replevin bond, interest should be allowed from the time of the taking of the property under the replevin writ to the date of judgment.

Reference

Full Case Name
Anton J. Cermak for use of James Moloney v. Cable Piano Company
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published