Cermak v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois May 15, 1918

Cermak v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co., 211 Ill. App. 337 (1918)

1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 444

Connor

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Replevin, § 152* — when judgment is sufficient. A judgment in a replevin suit complies with, section 22 of the Replevin Act (J. & A. f 9207) and is sufficient to support an action on the bond where it holds, in effect, that the property is held by the defendant in replevin for the payment of money, and orders that unless the amount for which it is so held be paid within twenty days, the property be returned. ,

Reference

Full Case Name: Anton J. Cermak, Bailiff, for use of Robert Eckhardt v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Company
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published