Beanland v. Sweitzer

Appellate Court of Illinois
Beanland v. Sweitzer, 21 Ill. App. 3d 121 (1974)
314 N.E.2d 736

Beanland v. Sweitzer

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Judgment was entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs in the amount of $2537. Defendants have appealed seeking reversal and remandment for a new trial.

Plaintiffs-appellees have moved to affirm the judgment, on the grounds that the defendants did not file a post-Mai motion, and therefore failed to preserve a basis for review by this court.

We believe plaintiffs-appellees’ interpretation of section 68.1 of the Civil Practice Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110, par. 68.1) is correct. Roberson v. Leak, 72 Ill.App.2d 11, 218 N.E.2d 819; Farnsworth v. Shops Budding, 77 Ill.App.2d 44, 222 N.E.2d 132.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. JUSTICE CREBS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Reference

Full Case Name
John R. Beanland, d/b/a Beanland Drilling Company v. Fred Sweitzer
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published