Court of Claims of Illinois, 1914

Payne v. State

Payne v. State
Court of Claims of Illinois · Decided November 19, 1914
2 Ill. Ct. Cl. 285; 1914 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 25

Counsel

Chipperfield & Chipperfield, Browne & Wiley, Duncan, Doyle & O’Conor, Howard H. Bayne, George P. Hills, Gleim & Colwell, for Claimant., P. J. Lucey, Attorney General, and Arthur R. Roy, Assistant Attorney General, (Stead, Woodward & Hibbs, of Counsel), for State.

Payne v. State

Opinion of the Court

This is one of the so-called Utica bridge cases and its decision is controlled by the decisions in the Morrissey and Farmer cases.

Claimant was eight years of age at the time of the accident, and was underneath the bridge. A part of the bridge fell upon her, her left leg was fractured near the hip. She was in bed eight weeks, and used crutches for a month. There is a shortening of about an inch with a limited motion in the flexing of the knee. Claimant is lame.

It is the judgment of the Court, that the claim be denied, without prejudice to the right of claimant to present her claim to the legislature, and with the statement, that if it were within our power, we would award to claimant the sum of twenty-five hundred dollars.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.