Court of Claims of Illinois, 1925

Connaghan v. State

Connaghan v. State
Court of Claims of Illinois · Decided May 1, 1925 · Phillips
5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 186; 1925 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 116

Counsel

Martindale & Martindale, for claimant., Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank E. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Connaghan v. State

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Phillips

delivered the opinion of the court: '

John Connaghan et al, claimants, file this claim for refund of inheritance taxes to be due them under the provisions of Section 25, Illinois Inheritance Tax laws.

It appears that claimant paid the sum of $443.39 with interest $32.87 equal $476.26.

Later, on proper petition, the court re-assessed said tax in sum of $32.00 and the interest thereon, to-wit: $2.40, equal $34.40 due as inheritance tax, showing* the sum of $441.86 less 2% retained by the county treasurer of Adams county, being* the sum of $8.84, leaving a balance due for refund to claimants the sum of $433.02, together with interest thereon at 3% per annum from February 1, 1924, to this date, which is ordered paid to claimants, John Connaghan, Daniel Connaghan, James. Connaghan, Mary Connaghan, Eose Gmeiner, Mary Warrell, Margaret Eobinson and Bridget Flannagan or their legal representatives.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.