Court of Claims of Illinois, 1933

Bilderback Investment Trust v. State

Bilderback Investment Trust v. State
Court of Claims of Illinois · Decided January 10, 1933 · Thomas
7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 122; 1933 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 8

Counsel

Bilderback Investment Trust, pro se., Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Carl Dietz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Bilderback Investment Trust v. State

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Thomas

delivered the opinion of the court:

Claimant is asking for an award of $30.00 paid by it for an insurance broker’s license. The declaration alleges it paid the $30.00 under the impression gained through lack of information that such sum was the correct amount the law required. The Attorney General has filed a demurrer to the declaration. It is apparent from the allegations of the declaration that the money was voluntarily paid. If any mistake was made by claimant, it was a mistake of law and not of fact. It is fundamental that a tax or license voluntarily paid cannot be recovered back. (Oakford & Fahnestock vs. State, 6 Ct. Cl. 439.) It is also equally well settled in this State that money paid under a mistake of law cannot be recovered back. (Illinois Merchants Trust Co. vs. Harvey, 335 Ill. 284; Richardson Lubricating Co. vs. Kinney, 337 Ill. 122; Oakford & Fahnestock vs. State, supra.)

The demurrer is sustained and the cause dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.