Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Court of Claims of Illinois, 1935

Bortowski v. State

Bortowski v. State
Court of Claims of Illinois · Decided October 15, 1935 · Linscott
9 Ill. Ct. Cl. 78; 1935 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 42

Counsel

John R. McSweeney, for claimant., Otto Keener, Attorney General; John Kassebman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Bortowski v. State

Opinion of the Court

Me. Justice Linscott

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case is based upon the same set of facts as set forth in the case of Joseph Schultz vs. State of Illinois, No. 2059, except that in this case the claimant was a passenger, which, in our opinion, does not change the legal situation.

The Attorney General also made a motion to dismiss this case, and the motion will be sustained for the same reasons as set forth in Schultz vs. State of Illinois, No. 2059.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.