Hindleman v. Specialty Salesman Magazine, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Hindleman v. Specialty Salesman Magazine, Inc., 1 F.R.D. 278 (1940)
1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1930
Hindleman v. Specialty Salesman Magazine, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff moves to strike certain portions of defendants’ answer. The motion must be allowed as to Paragraphs 9(A) to 104, both inclusive. From a mere inspection of the answer it is obvious that these paragraphs, together with the voluminous exhibits accompanying the answer, is a gross violation of Rules 8(b) and (e) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. fol
The court has heretofore overruled the defenses at law set up in Paragraphs 1(a) do (G), both inclusive.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- HINDLEMAN v. SPECIALTY SALESMAN MAGAZINE, Inc.
- Status
- Published