Lottie v. Riportella
Lottie v. Riportella
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION Tashawnbe D. Lottie, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 16 C 50271 v. ) ) Judge Philip G. Reinhard Sheriff Riportella #5098, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER This matter comes before the court on the Order, Report and Recommendations (“R & R”) [39] of Magistrate Judge Johnston recommending that the court dismiss this case for want of prosecution. The court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. See FED. R. CIv. P. 72(b)(3). The court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp.,
170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). In this case, the court has received no objections to the R & R (see [39], showing that objections were due by 4/10/18). The court has reviewed the record in this case and finds that the March 27, 2018 R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the court adopts in its entirety Judge Johnston’s R & R. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Final judgment will enter.
Date: 4/12/2018 ENTER:
United States District Court Judge
Notices mailed by Judicial Staff. (LC)
Reference
- Status
- Unknown