Iconic Energy LLC v. Solar Permit Services Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Iconic Energy LLC v. Solar Permit Services Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Iconic Energy LLC, ) ) ) Plaintiff; ) ) Vv. ) Case No: 18 CV 50020 ) Solar Permit Services, Inc., ) ) Defendant. ) Judge Frederick J. Kapala

ORDER Before the court is a report and recommendation (“R&R”) [41] from the magistrate judge recommending that defendant’s motion to vacate entry of default [24] be granted, contingent on defendant’s payment of the reasonable fees and costs the plaintiff incurred as a result of the default. After being afforded a sufficient opportunity, neither party has offered any objection to the R&R. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the R&R of the magistrate judge, see

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 149-50

(1985), and the court having reviewed the R&R, the court accepts the R&R and grants defendant’s motion to vacate entry of default, contingent on defendant’s payment of the reasonable fees and costs the plaintiff incurred as a result of the default. After the magistrate judge directed plaintiffs counsel to file a statement of the reasonable fees and costs incurred, plaintiff s counsel filed an affidavit in support of attorney’s fees [42-1]. Defendant objects to plaintiff s affidavit in support of attorney’s fees [44]. The court leaves resolution of the dispute over the affidavit in support of plaintiff's attorney’s fees to the magistrate judge.

Date: 8/20/2018 ENTER:

FREDERICK J. a District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown