IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

JAMES M. SIMPSON, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CIVIL NO. 19-cv-431-DGW1 ) COMMISSIONER of SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WILKERSON, Magistrate Judge:

Before the Court is the parties’ Agreed Motion for Remand to the Commissioner. (Doc. 20). The parties ask that this case be remanded for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of

(g). A sentence four remand (as opposed to a sentence six remand) depends upon a finding of error, and is itself a final, appealable order. See, Melkonyan v. Sullivan,

(1991); Perlman v. Swiss Bank Corporation Comprehensive Disability Protection Plan,

(7th Cir. 1999). Upon a sentence four remand, judgment should be entered in favor of plaintiff. Shalala v. Schaefer,

, 302- 303 (1993). The parties agree that, upon remand, “the ALJ will grant Plaintiff a new hearing; reevaluate Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity; reevaluate the medical

1 This case was assigned to the undersigned for final disposition upon consent of the parties pursuant to

(c). See, Doc. 11. source opinions, including those from Dr. Coyle and Dr. Garrido-Zambrano; and determine whether Plaintiff could perform his past relevant work or other work that exists in the national economy.” Plaintiff applied for disability benefits in March 2016. (Tr. 34). While recognizing that the agency has a full docket, the Court urges the Commissioner to expedite this case on remand. For good cause shown, the parties’ Agreed Motion for Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. 20) is GRANTED. The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiffs application for social security disability benefits is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner for rehearing and reconsideration of the evidence, pursuant to sentence four of

(g). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 30, 2019.

DONALD G. WILKERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE