The Hanover Insurance Group v. Hernandez

District Court, S.D. Illinois

The Hanover Insurance Group v. Hernandez

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, JOSHUA FORTE and ANGELA FORTE,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 19-1054 JPG/RJD

ROBERTO CENDENO HERNANDEZ, and EMC AUTO TRANSPORT, LLC,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

In light of Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals admonitions, see Foster v. Hill,

497 F.3d 695, 696-97

(7th Cir. 2007), the Court has undertaken a rigorous initial review of pleadings to ensure that jurisdiction has been properly pled. See Hertz Corp. v. Friend,

559 U.S. 77, 94

(2010) (noting courts’ “independent obligation to determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists, even when no party challenges it”). The Court has noted the following defects in the jurisdictional allegations of the Notice of Removal (Doc. 1) filed by defendants Roberto Cendeno Hernandez and EMC Auto Transport, LLC: Failure to allege the citizenship of each member of an unincorporated association. To determine if complete diversity exists, the Court must examine the citizenship of each member of a limited liability company. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs.,

494 U.S. 185, 195-96

(1990); Belleville Catering Co. v. Champaign Market Place, LLC,

350 F.3d 691, 692

(7th Cir. 2003) (partnerships and limited liability companies are citizens of every state of which any member is a citizen); Indiana Gas Co. v. Home Ins. Co.,

141 F.3d 314, 316

(7th Cir. 1998). The relevant pleading must affirmatively allege the specific states of citizenship of each member of the limited liability company.

Defendants state EMC Auto Transport, LLC is a limited liability company and is a citizen of Florida, but this is not enough. Defendants must allege each member of the LLC and their citizenship. The Court hereby ORDERS Defendants shall have up to and including October 14, 2019 to amend the faulty pleading to correct the jurisdictional defects. See

28 U.S.C. § 1653

. Failure to cure the noted defects will result in remand of this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Amendment of the faulty pleading to reflect an adequate basis for subject matter jurisdiction will satisfy this order. Defendants are directed to consult Local Rule 15.1 regarding amended pleadings and need not seek leave of Court to file such amended pleading.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 30, 2019

s/J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown